March 6, 2013
Rob Atkinson reflects on the adoption of Chief Innovation Officers in government.
March 5, 2013
ITIF calculates that the full weight of the research cuts could reduce U.S. gross domestic product by a minimum of $203 billion from now to 2021 and would result in 200,000 job losses this year alone.
MIT Technology Review
March 1, 2013
The sequester means across-the-board cuts to federal R&D and, barring a grand budget bargain, anemic research budgets in the years ahead.
The Christian Science Monitor
February 27, 2013
ITIF's report doesn't argue that federal deficits should be ignored. The sequester originated in federal law as a blunt tool, to ensure that if politicians couldn't agree on a substantial deficit-reduction plan, some spending cuts would be imposed automatically.
The Washington Post
February 26, 2013
ITIF projects that the United States will spend less on all types of R&D as a percentage of its economy in the coming decade than countries like Australia and South Korea.
July 19, 2013
By merging its science and energy undersecretaries DOE could better manage energy R&D, including the National Lab system.
Mother Nature Network
July 18, 2013
Millenial Trains Project: This isn't your Father's Road Trip
July 10, 2013
Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. lashes out at government technology leaders for being slow to adopt cost-saving reforms.
Federal Computer Week
July 10, 2013
The federal government's "cloud first" policy was articulated back in 2010, but adoption remains an ongoing process.
June 26, 2013
Matthew Stepp argues any climate plan must include the tripling of federal funding for clean energy R&D and reforms to the D.O.E.’s National Labs System.