News Articles
Featured
MIT Technology Review
March 1, 2013
The sequester means across-the-board cuts to federal R&D and, barring a grand budget bargain, anemic research budgets in the years ahead.
The Christian Science Monitor
February 27, 2013
ITIF's report doesn't argue that federal deficits should be ignored. The sequester originated in federal law as a blunt tool, to ensure that if politicians couldn't agree on a substantial deficit-reduction plan, some spending cuts would be imposed automatically.
The Washington Post
February 26, 2013
ITIF projects that the United States will spend less on all types of R&D as a percentage of its economy in the coming decade than countries like Australia and South Korea.
Bloomberg
February 25, 2013
Matthew Stepp comments on the success and limits seen in energy funding since ARPA-E's founding.
Globe and Mail
February 25, 2013
Rob Atkinson stressed to the Toronto "Globe and Mail" Canada's need to step up in the race for global advantage.
News Articles
Most Recent
MacNewsWorld
| May 17, 2013
Sen. Levin wants companies to invest more in America, but holding a hearing to shame Apple isn't the way to do it, maintained Rob Atkinson.
Roll Call
| May 10, 2013
ITIF notes that from 1997 to 2009 enrollment in the Advanced Placement test for music theory grew 362 percent while enrollment in the computer science AP test grew by only 12 percent.
Chronicle of Higher Education
| May 8, 2013
To improve the U.S. science and innovation enterprise, ITIF calls for replacing NSF with a new entity that would focus on engineering along with basic science.