March 6, 2013
Rob Atkinson reflects on the adoption of Chief Innovation Officers in government.
March 5, 2013
ITIF calculates that the full weight of the research cuts could reduce U.S. gross domestic product by a minimum of $203 billion from now to 2021 and would result in 200,000 job losses this year alone.
MIT Technology Review
March 1, 2013
The sequester means across-the-board cuts to federal R&D and, barring a grand budget bargain, anemic research budgets in the years ahead.
The Christian Science Monitor
February 27, 2013
ITIF's report doesn't argue that federal deficits should be ignored. The sequester originated in federal law as a blunt tool, to ensure that if politicians couldn't agree on a substantial deficit-reduction plan, some spending cuts would be imposed automatically.
The Washington Post
February 26, 2013
ITIF projects that the United States will spend less on all types of R&D as a percentage of its economy in the coming decade than countries like Australia and South Korea.
February 25, 2014
Prematurely trying to write the rules of the road for the Internet of Things will likely stagnate innovation, says Daniel Castro.
February 19, 2014
ITIF’s State New Economy Index ranks Wisconsin as 31st among the states.
February 14, 2014
Tax incentives can play a critical role in supporting energy innovation, but only if they are focused on supporting next generation technology development, says Matthew Stepp.
February 12, 2014
The real choice is between continued erosion of our manufacturing capabilities or a more revolutionary transformation through technology.
February 10, 2014
“We want to protect people’s privacy, but there are ways to do that without forestalling innovation,” says Daniel Castro