Winning the Race 2012 Memos: Boosting Innovation, Competitiveness, and Productivity

September 3, 2012
| Reports

Since the economy has still not fully recovered from the Great Recession, the challenge for the next administration will be two-fold: restoring U.S. global innovation leadership and driving productivity growth. To achieve robust job growth, the United States needs a growing and competitive “traded sector engine” powered by innovation. America also needs strong productivity growth because it is the surest way of addressing the fiscal challenge presented by the baby boom retirement. The next administration needs to make both top priorities and not be diverted by non-crisis foreign policy challenges or other domestic policy issues. We need the next President to state, to paraphrase John F. Kennedy, “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of U.S. innovation leadership.”

However, as long as economic policy is a fight between small government, free-market advocates and big government, Keynesian redistributionists it will be difficult to address major economic challenges. The next administration needs to put aside obsolete doctrinal views and focus pragmatically on ensuring that economic organizations in the United States (for-profit, non-profit and government) boost competitiveness, innovation, and productivity

Productivity, Innovation, Investment Boost Jobs

September 3, 2012
Rob Atkinson talks about how jobs are created through growth in productivity, innovation and investment.

Rob Atkinson talks about how jobs are created (not destroyed) through growth in productivity, innovation and investment with Media Freedom's Mike Wendy.

See video

More Baby Boomers Need to Delay Retirement

August 8, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds

The number of Americans aged 55 to 64 grew 8 times faster than the rest of the U.S. population in the last decade, reflecting the "pig in the python" of aging baby boomers. As this cohort retires in ever larger numbers they will place an ever greater strain on the economy, as they produce less (and pay fewer taxes) but consume more taxpayer-provided services such as Medicare and Social Security.

Road Congestion, TSA Congestion. What’s the Difference?

July 25, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds
If Congress is not going to continue to fund the TSA, the TSA should consider using a fee to allow customers to bypass long lines. The fee would also allow more income to the TSA, and therefore allow more staff to work at airport TSA stations.

Sun City or Sun Power: Early Retirement is Hurting America

July 20, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds

Americans face a choice as a country: we can either keep focusing on maximizing present consumption, especially by older people, or we can focus on maximizing production so we can afford the critical investments in America. If fewer American’s retired early and if we raised the retirement age to 70, we’d have more money to invest in science needs in research, infrastructure and skills, and maybe discover solar power that’s cheaper than coal power.

When Markets Fail, Do We All Lose? The Evidence Isn’t As Clear As Reported

June 19, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds

It may not have come as a surprise that a week ago, the Federal Reserve released a report showing how U.S. family wealth and income declined from 2007 to 2010. However, most mainstream media sources took a single statistic (changes in median wealth) from the over 80 page bulletin and ran away with the wrong message.

Bridges: Technology, Automation, and Innovation Create, Not Destroy, Jobs

May 25, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds

The problem for the US economy – and the global economy, for that matter – is not that we have too much innovation; rather, we don't have enough of it. What's needed is not for the political class to denigrate technology, automation, or innovation, but to enact more aggressive innovation-supporting policies: everything from more generous R&D tax credits and greater federal investment in R&D to better education policies. The nations that will do best in the intensifying global race for innovation-based economic growth are those that embrace both innovation and creative destruction, while also putting in place effective public policies that empower society to cope with the rapid and ongoing changes brought by technology, automation, and innovation.

Listen to this article.

Note to Tom Friedman: Technology Creates, Not Destroys, Jobs

January 25, 2012
| Blogs & Op-eds

Tom Friedman's Op-Ed in The New York Times in which he argues technology is destorying jobs is essentially a flawed argument. There are three essential reasons for this. First, the economic evidence. It is unambiguous that higher rates of productivity lead to more jobs in the medium to long term, not fewer jobs. Second, the most serious challenge facing the U.S. economy over the next 25 years is the declining worker to population ratio as the baby boomers age. Finally, if we want to raise the living standards of Americans now holding low wage jobs, the best way to do it is to increase, not decrease, automation of these jobs. When a job can only produce 10 dollars an hour in value, there is no way to pay more than $10 per hour. If we can use technology to boost the productivity of many low wage, low productivity jobs, we can pay more for these jobs and workers who move out of these occupations can move into higher value added ones.