Testimony and Filings

ITIF Supports the Immigration Innovation Act of 2015

January 14, 2015
| Testimony and Filings

ITIF expresses strong support of the Immigration Innovation Act of 2015 in a letter to Chuck Grassley, Chair of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. The Immigration Innovation Act of 2015 would greatly improve the system regulating high-skilled immigration and promote recruitment and retention of the workforce skills and intellectual capacity that are imperative to enhancing innovation in the United States.

Comments to ICANN on its Five-Year Operating Plan

January 5, 2015
| Testimony and Filings

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-profit organization that brings together various stakeholders to “discuss, debate, and develop policies about the technical coordination of the Internet’s domain name system (DNS).” ICANN has requested public comment on its Draft Five-Year Operating Plan. The Center for Data Innovation has filed comments describing how the ICANN community would benefit greatly from ICANN committing itself to open data and how such a commitment would bring its transparency and openness efforts in line with other leading global organizations.

Testimony to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories

December 17, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

Matthew Stepp, Executive Director of ITIF’s Center for Clean Energy Innovation, provided testimony to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories on methods for reforming the National Lab system to improve its innovation capabilities. The Commission was created by Congress to study the Department of Energy laboratory system and propose policy reforms to increase innovation and effectiveness from public investments in lab research. It was a created, in part, from a series of reports co-authored by Stepp titled, Turning the Page: Re-imagining the National Labs in the 21st Century Innovation Economy and Going Local: Connecting the National Labs to their Regions for Innovation and Growth.

ITIF Comments to the New York State Department of Financial Services on the Proposed BitLicense Framework

October 21, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

The New York State Department of Financial Services’ (NYSDFS) is currently considering regulations for virtual currencies (e.g. Bitcoin). While ITIF believes that the State of New York is likely the wrong entity to address these important policy issues, we have offered a number of recommendations should it continue to pursue these regulations. To strike the right balance that helps protect customers and root out illegal activity without stifling innovation or competition, New York should foster new entrants and budding virtual currencies without burdening their adoption with heavy-handed reporting requirements. Virtual currencies may be the next wave of innovation in our country’s financial services or they may be just a flash in the pan. Only time and a light regulatory touch will tell.

ITIF Comments on Connected Cars

October 20, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

ITIF submitted comments with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, recommending that it wait until DSRC and unlicensed devices can confidently share the 5.9 GHz band before mandating DSRC technology. We believe a mandate may well be appropriate to overcome the initial adoption hurdle, but the spectrum coexistence question should be resolved first.

ITIF Submits Comments to the National Science Foundation Regarding a National Privacy Research Strategy

October 17, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

To ensure the potential benefits of data-driven innovation are attained, the U.S. federal government should support research efforts to address the most pressing privacy and security research questions faced by industry and government. This filing describes five areas—healthcare, transportation, criminal justice, education, and social media—where additional research is needed on how to share data while best preserving privacy.

ITIF Files Comments in Support of AT&T – DirecTV Merger

October 16, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

In comments to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), ITIF argued the merger of AT&T and DirecTV will create a stronger broadband competitor, providing enhanced value to consumers and offsetting a reduction in the number of competitors in the relatively crowded urban video market. In addition, fears over anti-competitive control over interconnection by access networks are unfounded.

GMO Labeling is Unwarranted and Unnecessary

October 9, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

Val Giddings testified before the New Jersey Assembly’s State and Local Affairs Committee arguing that a proposed bill mandating labels for genetically modified foods is unnecessary and based on ideology and commercial interests not on safety or better informing consumers. GMO foods receive unprecedented testing and review from multiple government, non-governmental and international organizations making state labeling initiatives redundant and costly without providing any additional benefits to consumers.

Testimony in Opposition to Pennsylvania’s Mandatory GMO Labeling Bill

October 8, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

Giddings testified before the Pennsylvania House of Representatives’ Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee in opposition to HB 1770, a bill which would mandate warning labels on foods derived from crops improved through biotechnology. Giddings argued GMO labeling is redundant and unnecessary due to the the global consensus on the safety of biotech improved seeds and the comprehensive reviews and oversight of GMO crops and foods that are already being undertaken by multiple federal agencies. He also noted that labeling legislation is driven by fear, ideology and commercial interests not on a concern for consumers or safety.

ITIF Responds to White House Strategy for American Innovation RFI

September 23, 2014
| Testimony and Filings

The Obama Administration has requested public comment as it begins a process to author a second Strategy for American Innovation. ITIF commends the Administration as it begins to undertake this effort. ITIF's response to the RFI notes that a successful strategy for American innovation must promote both technological-based and non-technological-based (i.e., institutional and organizational) innovation throughout all layers of an economy, including the private sector, government agencies, and non-profit organizations. In other words, the strategy should not only address innovation in government; rather, its chief aim should be to fundamentally change private sector activity and behaviors to spur greater levels of innovation. 

Syndicate content