Competitiveness

Innovation, including the diffusion of information technology throughout the economy, is key to boosting productivity, which in turn is at the heart of increasing living standards.

U.S. Competitiveness: A New Conversation with New Opportunities

March 10, 2011 - 8:00am - 1:00pm
Union Station
50 Massachusetts Ave NE
Columbus Room
Washington
DC
20002

View the event agenda. Read more »

U.S. Competitiveness: A New Conversation with New Opportunities

March 10, 2011
Multimedia from the conference on how to boost productivity and competitiveness by advancing emerging growth sectors.

There is a growing sense of urgency for bipartisan commitment to restoring America's competitive edge through innovation. In that spirit, ITIF hosts a seminal half-day conference on how the United States can revitalize economic growth by boosting innovation and productivity in existing industries while also advancing emerging growth sectors such as nanotechnology, biotechnology and mobile broadband.

One from Column A, B, and C: Finding a New Bipartisan Consensus on U.S. Competitiveness and Innovation Policy

March 10, 2011
| Reports

A number of reports show that U.S. innovation-based competitiveness continues to slip against foreign competitors. Yet while both political parties and their ideologically affiliated special interest groups have offered their own sets of recommendations to restore competitiveness, the United States remains bogged down in partisan bickering, ideological rigidity, and an inability of each side to acknowledge the merits of the others’ proposals. But U.S. competitiveness can no longer be seen as a partisan issue. For the U.S. to restore its innovation-based competitiveness to a world-leading position, it will have to forge a new bipartisan consensus on U.S. competitiveness and innovation policies that blends the best ideas from left and right around four key policy areas: tax, trade, technology, and talent.

In essence, we need to choose the best policies from column “D” and column “R.” That is, selecting both from policies that Democrats would be more likely to favor and Republicans more likely to oppose, while also drawing from policy recommendations Republicans would be more likely to champion and Democrats more likely to resist. From the latter category, the United States must expand public investment in innovation, fully fund key innovation-supporting agencies (such as the PTO, FDA, and statistical agencies), fund STEM education, and support trade enforcement. But this is not sufficient, for the United States also needs to adopt more (traditionally conservative) policies from the latter category, including making the U.S. tax code much more efficient, harnessing the power of private enterprise rather than shackling it through excessive regulations, expanding trade agreements, and fostering high-skill immigration.

The Obama Administration's Innovation Policy

March 9, 2011 - 8:00am - 11:00am
Hamilton Crowne Plaza
1001 14th Street NW
Washington
DC
20005

View the event agenda. Read more »

The Obama Administration's Innovation Policy

March 9, 2011
Multimedia from the event.

In his 2011 State of Union Address, President Obama warned of a "Sputnik moment" in calling for the nation to confront our international economic competitiveness and innovation policy challenges. Read more »

Innovation Union Shows Europe Has Gotten Message about Innovation-Based Economic Growth

February 23, 2011
| Blogs & Op-eds

Europe has gotten the message that innovation drives economic growth says European Commission Director-General of Research and Innovation, Robert-Jan Smits, and it is focusing on improving conditions for and removing barriers to innovation while increasing public investment in R&D to three percent of European GDP with the goal of "making Europe the world's most attractive environment for R&D, innovation, business investment, and entrepreneurship." Smits says Europe has recognized that it "must preserve investment in research and innovation which are the main sources of future growth." In this blog post, Senior Policy Analyst Stephen Ezell says this is a message U.S. policymakers would be wise to heed.

Syndicate content