Competitiveness

Innovation, including the diffusion of information technology throughout the economy, is key to boosting productivity, which in turn is at the heart of increasing living standards.

Require the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to incorporate a “competitiveness screen” in its review of federal regulations.

In an era when global trade was minimal and the dominance of U.S. competitiveness was largely assured, the nation could afford to impose new regulatory requirements with little thought given to their impact on the competitiveness of traded sectors. But today, regulation can and does increase costs on industries in traded sectors that in turn make them less competitive globally. To the extent federal regulation makes distinctions between companies, it’s often on the basis of size, but it should rather be on whether a firm is in an industry facing global competition or not. To address this, regulatory agencies seeking to impose regulations that affect traded sectors in non-trivial ways should be required to have these regulations undergo a review by OMB’s OIRA for their first-order competitiveness impact. Moreover, given the limited amount of time and attention available for regulatory review, the highest priority should be placed on reviewing those regulations that directly impact traded sectors.

The White House should create an Office of Innovation Review in OMB (i.e., an Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for Innovation).

All too often federal agencies propose regulations with little consideration given to their effect on innovation. To remedy this, Congress should create within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) an Office of Innovation Review (OIR) that would have the specific mission of being the “innovation champion” within these processes. OIR would have authority to push agencies to either affirmatively promote innovation or achieve a particular regulatory objective in a manner least damaging to innovation. It would be authorized both to propose new agency action and to respond to existing agency action. OIR would add an important new voice to the regulatory conversation. First, there would now be an entity speaking clearly and forthrightly on the centrality of innovation. Second, and more importantly, OIR would have more than just a voice; it would be able to remand agency actions that harm innovation. It would also propose regulation that benefits innovation as part of its mission. But OIR would not be designed to thwart federal regulation; as a matter of fact, in some cases, the existence of OIR might lead to increased federal regulation (e.g., more Environmental Protection Agency regulations might pass muster under cost-benefit analysis if innovation-related effects were calculated).

Ask Not What Innovation Can do for You; Ask What You Can do for Innovation

March 21, 2013
| Blogs & Op-eds

A nation focused only on the present generation would not invest in the future. Why pay higher taxes and prices to support government and corporate investments in research, education, and infrastructure when the benefits accrue to future generation? In other words, innovation is fundamentally a selfless act: it’s about giving up some of our current consumption for future innovation benefits, some of which, at least, will benefit our children. You might say, “so what.” Here’s what. There is a growing selfishness and preference for current consumption today in America and around the world. And this plays out it in the two critical drivers of innovation: creation of knowledge (e.g., research and development) and the presence of large markets to ensure adequate revenue to reinvest back into knowledge creation. Both are under threat today.

Ready for an Uncertain Future? Revitalizing the Organizational Skill Set

March 13, 2013
| Presentations

Growth? Recession? Disruptive change? New competition? Social unrest? Rarely has even the near term future seemed so uncertain. Market-leading firms must be ready for whatever is to come. ITIF president Rob Atkinson will present at this one-day conference to iscuss how firms are revitalizing their workforces to prepare for a highly uncertain business future where increasingly “the readiness is all.”

Register now.

Revenge of the Luddites

February 26, 2013
| Blogs & Op-eds

In a world where innovation is consciously limited, incomes will increase more slowly and technological progress to improve health and provide new products and services will be impaired. If Americans want the country to regain its position as global innovation leader, replacing neo-Ludditism with good old fashioned American risk taking and faith in the future needs to be at the top of the agenda.

True Innovation Doesn’t Flow from a Pipeline

Globe and Mail
Rob Atkinson stressed to the Toronto "Globe and Mail" Canada's need to step up in the race for global advantage.

Europe's Real Innovation Challenge

February 25, 2013
| Blogs & Op-eds

Europe and America possess real innovation strengths. But unless they recognize the global nature of the innovation competitiveness challenge, and respond to it, we must expect slow growth, anemic job creation and rising budget deficits to be the dominant features of tomorrow, wrote Rob Atkinson in this special op-ed of the Spring 2013 issue of Europe's World.

Making America Competitive Again: Restoring U.S. Innovation Leadership

February 14, 2013 - 9:00am - 10:45am
Capitol Visitor Center
United States Capitol
Room HVC-201
Washington
DC
20510

In the last six months, three major books or reports have been released that raise serious concerns about the faltering state of U.S. innovation and competitiveness. These works share four critical themes: 1) The U.S. Read more »

Making America Competitive Again: Restoring U.S. Innovation Leadership

February 14, 2013
An event that will explore the causes, evidence, and consequences of faltering U.S. competitiveness.

In the last six months, three major books or reports have been released that raise serious concerns about the faltering state of U.S. innovation and competitiveness. These works share four critical themes: 1) The U.S. Read more »

See video

Silicon Valley and Immigrant Groups Find Common Cause

The New York Times
The odds of high-skilled immigration reform passing without comprehensive reform is close to zero, and the odds of comprehensive passing without high-skilled passing is close to zero.